GBaxOS ยท Inbound Verification Pipeline

Email in. Sealed, confidence-gated status out.

01Intake Adapters
02GBaxOS API Core
03Output Adapters
core

Confidence Gate

Core. The extraction is a probabilistic vision read, so it is never assumed correct. Each contract-critical field carries a confidence score. If any falls below threshold, the document becomes AMBER and goes to a human โ€” it is never auto-approved on an uncertain read.

Code blueprint
# Every contract-critical field carries a per-field confidence score.
critical = [extracted.amount_conf, extracted.type_conf, extracted.period_conf]

if min(critical) < THRESHOLD:
    status = "AMBER"          # uncertain read -> human review
elif verdict == "MATCH":
    status = "GREEN"          # confident AND in-tolerance
else:
    status = "RED"            # confident mismatch

# AMBER is the honest path: uncertainty surfaced, not buried.
Why it's built this way

This is the honest center of the pipeline. A false GREEN releases payment on a non-compliant waiver; the confidence gate is what makes that failure mode something you measure and contain instead of something that surprises you in production.

Process log
Run a scenario to trace the pipeline.

Integrity seal = unchanged from ingestion forward. Confidence gate = no uncertain machine read auto-clears payment.